Monthly Archives: February 2017

Signed sets and ballots and naturality

This is blog post #3 in a series on signed sets and ballots (the previous posts are here and here). Naturality, isomorphism, and equipotence When are two species isomorphic? Since species are, by definition, functors , the obvious answer is … Continue reading

Posted in combinatorics, math, species | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Signed sets and ballots, part 2

Recall, from my previous post, that our goal is to find a combinatorial proof showing the correspondence between signed sets and signed ballots, where a signed set is just a set of elements, considered positive or negative according to the … Continue reading

Posted in combinatorics, math, species | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Signed sets and ballots, part 1

The other day, Anders Claesson wrote a very nice blog post explaining a more combinatorial way to understand multiplicative inverses of virtual species (as opposed to the rather algebraic way I explained it in my previous post). In the middle … Continue reading

Posted in combinatorics, math, species | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Virtual species suffice

Over six years ago, I wrote a post explaining how virtual species are defined. Ever since then (time flies!) I’ve been meaning to write a follow-up post explaining a bit more about virtual species and how they actually suffice to … Continue reading

Posted in combinatorics | Tagged , | 23 Comments